

So the story actually made perfect sense, it's just that people didn't get it.Īnd so on and so on. The reason Tyrande didn't kill Sylvanas when she was about to choke her was not actually because Elune withdrew her powers but rather because Tyrande made the choice not to kill her in order to choose renewal instead of vengeance. Because the whole thing about titan keepers, Old Gods and what have you, came as far out of left-field as the Jailer, the Eternal Ones, etc.Ĥ. They would have said, "Who the hell are these Keepers? Who are these Old Gods? What's going on? I hate it" and stuff like that. If modern players (or at least players who are dissatisfied with the Shadowlands lore) had played Ulduar, they would've hated it. Mind you this was just after the Sanctum of Domination cinematic had been released and prior to the whole split soul narrative was introduced in game so it wasn't part of his argument.ģ. People who don't find it plausible that Sylvanas would be dumb enough to believe that the guy who is literally called the Jailor, who has a fetish for chains and for tormenting souls, will bring freedom to the world tend to be males who because of their privilege are unable to understand just how gullible oppressed women really are. In other words, if you want a coherent storyline in a fantasy world where things actually make sense (and where we've killed people for far less than what Sylvanas has done) then you're probably also supporting the death penalty irl.Ģ. People who are upset about the lack of accountability for Sylvanas are people who come from countries that include the death penalty. Let me give you a few of his greatest hits.ġ. I still thought his videos funny and somewhat insightful.Īnd then I made the mistake of discovering his Twitter profile. I didn't agree with him on everything, but that's fine. I kind of thought of him as a cool levelheaded guy with a nuanced perspective on things. Prior to Shadowlands I actually liked watching his videos. And I dislike Taliesin, among other reasons because he has used ad hominem arguments similar to the one you've just used in order to preemptively shut down any kind of criticism. I don't think acknowledging the existence of gay people is grooming.

But so is everyone who actually believes whatever they believe, or else they wouldn't believe it I hold leftist views too. It's people with reprehensible viewpoints being upset that they don't get gifted a platform to spew those reprehensible viewpoints, so they try to falsely equivocate that those opposed to them are also reprehensible. You can see in this thread how some of them have literally questioned why he hasn't been "canceled". People who support insurrection and bigotry seem to feel that this is not fair to them because they get banned for saying that acknowledging the existence of gay people is grooming, for instance, among other things. He holds leftist views and isn't afraid to air them out on his streams.
